Vaping is safer than smoking. This is getting dangerously disturbing.
The survey found that the number of people who think vagueness is both harmful, or even more harmful, increases smoking.
Amid many controversies about the health effects of vaping, one state’s health experts agree: E-cigarettes are less damaging than regular cigarettes. Tobacco kills up to half of its users, which is why appalling cigarettes are being introduced to the market by consumers. Even with uncertainty about the dangers of long-term breaks, researchers have found that smoking produces fewer toxins and carcinogens than cigarette smokers.
The state meanwhile seems rather confused.
The number of people who think e-cigarettes pose a similar risk to conventional cigarettes is rising in the US, according to a new survey published this week. CURRENTLY. It was found that the percentage of adults who said e-cigarettes were less harmful than cigarettes and combustibles dropped from 29 per cent to 26 per cent between 2017 and 2018. Meanwhile, the percentage of people who believe e-cigarettes to be harmful has increased from 36 percent to 43 percent in the same period.
There is also a rise in the number of believers who are much more dangerous or even more dangerous than smoking, from 2 per cent to 4 per cent between 2017 and 2018.
The trend has also kept up with current and former smokers – a group that has benefited from switching to vaping. That’s about it, said Amy Nyman, an associate director of study and research at the School of Public Administration at Georgia State University. “Smokers who feel too much at risk from using e-cigarettes may decide to quit smoking and more importantly continue with their combustible smoking habit.”
Smoking is literally the most dangerous thing anyone can do, Michael Eriksen, co-author of the paper and dean of the Georgia State Public Schools, told Vox. “to equate to the public” [e-cigarettes and cigarettes] and see [vaping] That’s actually more harmful than smoking is amazing. “
These survey data were collected prior to the onset of lung disease, which, on November 20, got sick and killed more than two thousand people across the US. Although the case for the riots is now mainly in combination with THC vape products, “If this survey was done again, it would probably be even more shocking in terms of negative perceptions,” added Eriksen.
How troubled is the public health message about vaping?
Now the question is: Why is the public health e-cigarette message so disturbed? The researchers had few ideas about it.
- Communication is notoriously dangerous. People have a serious time difference between absolute risk and relative risk. (Relative risk relates to the odds of an event compared to someone else – such as smoking from smoking compared to vaping. Absolute risk refers to the risk of an event at all over a period of time – such as long-term smoke hazards. Explaining cancer. we are not communicating,” Eriksen said.
- This is not help The media and policy debates about vaping are not very nuanced. Over the last couple of years, stories have abounded about the acute health risk to goats — such as e-cigarette cartridges explode or “popcorn lungs”, a dangerous condition that first appeared among workers exposed to chemical components in the production of popcorn.
Separately, the regulative debate about vapingers is aiming at banning certain products of e-cigarettes, or as the American Medical Association recommended this week, banning all vapinging products at the same time, “except for those approved by the FDA for tobacco cessation purposes and made available by prescription only.” These stories — about severe short-term risks and catastrophes — can be easily lost by long-term public safety messages about the benefits of e-cigarettes for smokers, for example.
- There are still no FDA approved vape devices for quitting smoking; Thus the public health community was largely destroyed. In the UK, e-cigarettes are treated as a medicine and are available to help people quit smoking. “we” [in public health] don’t share that message here because e-cigarettes are not approved [smoking] incessant thoughts,” Eriksen explained. “So this is a waste of information. “This was meant for smokers who want to use vapes so that they are left to sail, seeking advice from doctors, friends, or even local vape shops. It also meant not much There may sometimes be erroneous marketing by e-cigarette manufacturers, and this recklessness is not a great starting point to accurately report public safety.
The general public should understand that non-tobacco users should never spend. Vaping, while safer than smoking, carries health risks and long-term harm that is still unknown. “These products are not safe. They are toxic. If the user is not present, do not use them,” Eriksen said.
Another message for smokers: they could make changes to reduce the risk of tobacco-related diseases. Again, there is overwhelming proof that vaping is safer than smoking. For example, the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has developed 2018 reports on e-cigarette devices in 800 peer-reviewed studies. “Conclusive evidence,” the report stated, “is to replace combustible tobacco e-cigarettes as combustible cigarettes, using exposure to the numerous toxic and carcinogens present in combustible tobacco in cigarettes.”